Court slaps Rs 1 lakh fine on accused for Nike’s trademark infringement

A Delhi court has directed a man to pay Rs one lakh as damages to the US-based Nike for infringing […]

   

A Delhi court has directed a man to pay Rs one lakh as damages to the US-based Nike for infringing its trademark by selling products under the name of the popular global sports goods brand. Additional district judge Anil Antil directed north-west Delhi resident Ashok Kumar Singh to pay the damages to the brand for using a “deceptively similar” trademark and causing confusion in the minds of the public. “Customer base of the products of both the parties are the same. The representation of the marks by the defendant (Singh) tends to cause confusion in the minds of the general public as well as to the customers. “If the defendant is permitted to use the impugned mark which are deceptively similar and confusingly to that of the plaintiff’s company (Nike), it will not only cause wrongful loss to the plaintiff company, but will also cause grave prejudice and harm to public, not to mention about loss to the goodwill of the plaintiff,” the judge said. The court’s order came on a suit filed by company Nike Innovative CV, based in Oregon, USA, alleging that the defendant was found selling sports wear, bags and other goods under its trademark. The court had earlier granted ex-parte injunction to the company after the defendant failed to appear before it. Nike is engaged in the business of manufacturing, distributing and selling a large variety of goods including footwear, athletic suit, bags, sports goods, watches, eyewear, consumer electronic products and other related products, the suit said. It alleged that Singh had copied and adopted the company’s artistic features including the trademark, label, trade name and domain name and infringed its copyrights. The court, while deciding the suit in the company’s favour, said “Nothing has come on record to disbelieve the case of the plaintiff or doubt the authenticity and veracity of the document filed on record. The defendant did not come forward to disprove the case of plaintiff his stand.” “I am of the view plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages to the tune of Rs one lakh in his favour and against the defendant,” the judge said.

Trending

MSMEs

GeM has processed orders worth ₹ 40,000 cr in GMV in last 3 years, 50% transacted by MSMEs

Day-after-Piyush Goyal snub-Jeff-Bezos

Day after Piyush Goyal snub, Amazon commits to create one million new jobs in India by 2025

Amazon's-$1-bn-investment-in-India-no-big-favour--Minister-of-Commerce-&-Industry

Amazon’s $1 bn investment in India no big favour: Piyush Goyal, Commerce & Industry Minister

Jeff Bezos India visit

Amazon CEO, Jeff Bezos bets on Indian century, invests $1 bn digitizing MSMEs

MSME loans

Piyush Goyal: CGTMSE, SIDBI to set up framework for faster processing of SME loans

GST

Nirmala Sitharaman: GST to be further simplified for traders

UK Sinha committee

Government invites stakeholder’s suggestion on National Technology Mission for MSMEs

Delhi-NCR-the-largest-start-up-ecosystem-in-India,-surpasses-Bangalore

Delhi-NCR the largest start-up ecosystem in India, surpasses Bangalore

Premium Organic Soaps- Contribution to the Community

Anant-Nahata

Public charging infrastructure will be key to electric vehicle success in India: Anant Nahata, MD, Exicom 

MSME payments

Startups, MSMEs request for timely payments from government and corporates

Ashok-Prusty

Indian EV battery industry still searching for commercial battery technology: Ashok Kumar Prusty, Bry-Air